Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: "Didier" <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:49:44 +0200

Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:14:20 -0700, Guy Harris wrote
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:01 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> I suspect "slicing out the capture code and putting it into WinPcap",
>   which I assume is what you have in mind, would count as 
> "significant  modifications of [your] own".  However, I don't know 
> what additional  restrictions that'd put on, say, somebody re-
> packaging WinPcap.

Or you can ask Benoit, I know him and I don't see how it could be an issue.

Didier

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
      • From: Guy Harris
  • References:
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
      • From: Varuna De Silva
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
      • From: Guy Harris
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
      • From: Guy Harris
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems with the newly modified and compiled wpcap.dll
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Alternative to USBPcap and Possibility of
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation