ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] Voip Call filters

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 02:12:13 -0800
Francisco Alcoba (TS/EEM) wrote:

The patch in
  http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200502/msg00451.html

introduced a protocol-independent filter based on frame numbers.

So is the purpose of this to set the display to show all packets in the VoIP conversation, regardless of the protocol?

A general mechanism a tap can use, where it can request a "filter" operation in which it either

1) calls a routine that scans through the packets, calls back to the tap to ask whether the frame should or shouldn't be included and, if it should be included, dissects the frame to generate the column data and adds it to the display

or

2) calls a routine to clear out the "passed_dfilter" flag on all frames, loops over the frames and calls a routine to set that flag on frames it wants in the display, and then calls another routine that scans over all the frames and puts the ones with that flag set into the display

would probably be the best way to handle this.

The tap should probably also be able to add to the drop-down list of filters an entry with a string (used as the text in the drop-down list as well as in the filter field), a function pointer for a callback, and a pointer passed to that callback, so you can select that item from the drop-down list and re-apply the "filter" by calling back the function. (The function pointer could be null - that'd put the text into the filter field, but not in the drop-down list, and would be used if it's infeasible to re-apply the "filter".) Those entries would be removed when the capture file is closed.

The attached patch tries with frame number based filters; if it gets longer than
2048 characters -that seems to be the limit for display filters- it reverts to
the old code -which do not cover some cases, like MGCP, but is better than nothing-.

Checked in as a short-term workaround.