ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] Voip Call filters

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Francisco Alcoba (TS/EEM)" <francisco.alcoba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:16:48 +0100
> > The patch in 
> > 
> >   http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200502/msg00451.html
> > 
> > introduced a protocol-independent filter based on frame numbers.
> 
> So is the purpose of this to set the display to show all 
> packets in the 
> VoIP conversation, regardless of the protocol?
> 
> A general mechanism a tap can use, where it can request a "filter" 
> operation in which it either
> 
> 	1) calls a routine that scans through the packets, 
> calls back to the 
> tap to ask whether the frame should or shouldn't be included 
> and, if it 
> should be included, dissects the frame to generate the column 
> data and 
> adds it to the display
> 
> or
> 
> 	2) calls a routine to clear out the "passed_dfilter" 
> flag on all 
> frames, loops over the frames and calls a routine to set that flag on 
> frames it wants in the display, and then calls another routine that 
> scans over all the frames and puts the ones with that flag 
> set into the 
> display
> 
> would probably be the best way to handle this.
> 

The objective is to create a string in the display filter window, so that, e.g.,
afterwards another call can be added to the filter. A routine that 
shows the packets without building a display filter would not serve that
purpose.

Regards,

  Francisco