Hi,
I think this is a casualty of the new_packet_list implementation.
Please file a new bug report, start the title with "new_packet_list: " and
append your text.
A back reference to bug 2604 should be included as well.
Thanks,
Jaap
On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:40:09 +0200, Boonie <newsboonie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks Jaap,
>
> I've checked the XML page and tryed the new features. Nice.
>
>
> I also found a bug. This was fixed in a previous version and seems to
> be back. Here is the link to the old bug.
>
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2604
>
> Would you like me to report it as a new bug?
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> 2010/5/28 Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're trying to collect the relevant stuff in the Release Notes. These
>> aren't
>> published yet, but here is the XML source of the document:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk/docbook/release-notes.xml
>> Not the most readable, but you'll figure it out ;)
>>
>> Furthermore stuff is written up in the User's Guide, published on the
>> website:
>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked
>> Not nearly as nice and complete as Laura did, but he, we're writing the
>> code.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jaap
