Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Andrew Hood <ajhood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:03:44 +1000

Nathan Jennings wrote:
> On 4/6/2009 11:24 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> 
>>Jeff Morriss wrote:
>>
>>>Once Wireshark is up, is it usable [going to Gerald's suggestion]?
>>
>>	Its a little lagy but usable. I wouldn't want to use it all day long, but its ok for intermittent use. My feeling is 
>>that its slower than other things running on that machine over X (yast, xterm, emacs, etc). Those are all pretty usable. 
>>In those applications the lag is there, but its not bothersome at all. The ping latencies are fairly fast
> 
> 
> This may not apply to you, but in my experience we've had slow rendering 
> times due to our Microsoft Windows X servers not supporting anti-aliased 
> font rendering. We worked around this in the past by disabling 
> anti-aliased fonts in GTK.

Slow startup doesn't only apply to GTK. Motif apps are also noticably
slow to start over my ADSL2+ link. Snooping that traffic shows huge
amounts of chatter as the client queries the server for the fonts it
supports. LBX speeds things up (sometimes dramatically), but not all X
servers support it. Reducing the fonts the X servers supports speeds
things up too.

-- 
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
                -- Dr. Who

  • References:
    • [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Jeremy Linton
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Jeff Morriss
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Jeremy Linton
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Jeff Morriss
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Jeremy Linton
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
      • From: Nathan Jennings
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using port numbers to determine next dissector
  • Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] RTCP Frame length check: Wrong
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] slow startup caused by splash_update?
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27959: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-wcp.c packet-x11.c /trunk/epan/: tvbuff.c tvbuff.h
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation