Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] new plugin for SIMULCRYPT protocol ready forcontribution - can anyone check for code quality etc / helpwith submission as build-in?

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: <david.castleford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:39:30 +0200

Hi,
 
Submitted a bug report with patch and example capture file for the dissector:
 
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935
 
Cheers,
 
David

De : wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de david.castleford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Envoyé : jeudi 2 octobre 2008 17:25
À : wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [Wireshark-dev] new plugin for SIMULCRYPT protocol ready forcontribution - can anyone check for code quality etc / helpwith submission as build-in?

Hi,
 
I've been working on a Simulcrypt  (SCS-ECMG interface) plugin on Windows platform.
 
I've got it working with latest \trunk development branch (compiles fine on Windows XP with Visual Studio 2005).
 
I've followed existing examples / dissectors but would appreciate help from anyone who is willing to check for code quality etc.
Perhaps it doesn't compile on other platforms, I don't know.
 
I've read the 3.9 Contribute your changes quickly.
I'm not quite sure how to include it directly as a build-in dissector, presumably the .c and .h files go directly in \epan\dissectors?
I'm not familiar with fuzz testing either.....
Basically a newbie :-)
 
And to make things worse I've changed activity and shouldn't be really spending time on this :-)
 
Nonetheless I think it would be a shame not to submit what I've written.
 
Thanks for any feedback.
 
Best regards,
 
David
 
  • References:
    • [Wireshark-dev] new plugin for SIMULCRYPT protocol ready for contribution - can anyone check for code quality etc / help with submission as build-in?
      • From: david.castleford
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Making a dissector for a text proto using ISO 10646 (Unicode) in UCS-2(was: Using external DTD)
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26342: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dcerpc-samr.c /trunk/epan/dissectors/pidl/: samr.idl
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] new plugin for SIMULCRYPT protocol ready for contribution - can anyone check for code quality etc / help with submission as build-in?
  • Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Should tvb always be != NULL
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation