Graeme Lunt wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I just modified the U3 package build to add the version number to the
>> package file name. (Hopefully this doesn't break anything Graeme is doing).
>
> Shouldn't break anything.
>
>> Is there any reason the Windows U3 package shouldn't be added as one of
>> the official release packages (and to Buildbot)?
>
> Not as far as I am concerned. I am keen to increase the user base and
> as Ulf says, "beta" or "experimental" sounds the right label.
>
> I have a couple of changes to check in to include the right/latest
> libraries which I should get to in the next couple of days.
It's now part of the build process. Buildbot-generated U3 packages are
now deposited in http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32/,
just like the executable installers.
