On 1/10/07, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just modified the U3 package build to add the version number to the
package file name. (Hopefully this doesn't break anything Graeme is doing).
Shouldn't break anything.
Is there any reason the Windows U3 package shouldn't be added as one of
the official release packages (and to Buildbot)?
Not as far as I am concerned. I am keen to increase the user base and
as Ulf says, "beta" or "experimental" sounds the right label.
I have a couple of changes to check in to include the right/latest
libraries which I should get to in the next couple of days.
Graeme
