Comment # 38
on bug 3290
from Jeff Morriss
(In reply to comment #35)
> (In reply to comment #34)
> > Does this still deserve to be In Progress? I think it can be marked as fixed
> > now, and the remaining stale patches denied?
>
> Well keep in mind that so far only proto_tree_add_item() and
> proto_tree_add_bits_item() are protected; the other proto_tree_add_XXX()
> APIs are not.
>
> Though, OTOH, I guess those other APIs are (in the common case) protected
> because the thing's value you're adding to the tree has (presumably) already
> been fetched with tvb_get_XXX(). Maybe the others don't really need
> protection...
Bug 9983 just showed that dissectors don't necessarily fetch their FT_BYTES
before calling proto_tree_add_bytes*().
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
- You are watching all bug changes.
