Comment # 1
on bug 8339
from Steve Magnani
I've been thinking about this some more and I think there's a good argument to
be made that the big-endian behavior of this patch is wrong, or at least not
the most likely use case. But I don't actually have a big-endian use (or test)
case.
So in a respin of this patch I can either:
* DISSECTOR_ASSERT ENC_NA or ENC_LITTLE_ENDIAN, until someone encounters a
big-endian use case
OR
* Modify the code so that the big-endian case works the same as the
little-endian
Also I noticed that README.developer will need to be updated.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
