https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #10 from Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-14 06:08:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > What I will do here is the following. As Powerlink is a similair protocol as
> > > SercosIII and Profinet, both of which are implemented as plugins, I will remove
> > > both dissectors from the "normal" dissectors, and move them into a plugin.
> >
> > In fact the general direction with Wireshark has been the opposite: to get rid
> > of plugins and make them all built-in dissectors. I don't remember all the
> > reasons, but personally I dislike plugins because of all the overhead each one
> > requires (e.g., requiring so many files per dissector) and the fact that (GNU)
> > "make -j <N>" doesn't compile them in parallel.
>
> Ok, sorry, did not know that. In that case, I will merge both dissectors in
> epan.
Merging the dissectors is not useful, as it will complicate maintenance. But
both header files can go, see #5751 for more details.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5751 ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
