https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5725
--- Comment #9 from Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-02 06:56:51 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > What I will do here is the following. As Powerlink is a similair protocol as
> > SercosIII and Profinet, both of which are implemented as plugins, I will remove
> > both dissectors from the "normal" dissectors, and move them into a plugin.
>
> In fact the general direction with Wireshark has been the opposite: to get rid
> of plugins and make them all built-in dissectors. I don't remember all the
> reasons, but personally I dislike plugins because of all the overhead each one
> requires (e.g., requiring so many files per dissector) and the fact that (GNU)
> "make -j <N>" doesn't compile them in parallel.
Ok, sorry, did not know that. In that case, I will merge both dissectors in
epan.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
