https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5746
--- Comment #7 from Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-11 18:28:41 MST ---
The following patch fixes the problem for this packet, but we may need to do a
check to see if the first two bytes are 0xff03 or a protocol identifier before
deciding which PPP dissection to pass it on to:
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-sflow.c
===================================================================
--- epan/dissectors/packet-sflow.c (revision 36176)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-sflow.c (working copy)
@@ -15,8 +15,7 @@
*
*
* Based on Jeff Rizzo's <riz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dissector for sFlow v2/4
- * in Wireshark 1.0.8 public release.
- *
+ * in Wireshark 1.0.8 public release. *
* Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer
* By Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs
@@ -3404,7 +3403,7 @@
fddi_handle = find_dissector("fddi");
fr_handle = find_dissector("fr");
x25_handle = find_dissector("x.25");
- ppp_handle = find_dissector("ppp");
+ ppp_handle = find_dissector("ppp_hdlc");
#if 0
smds_handle = find_dissector("smds");
#else
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
