Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Tons of ARP packets...?

From: IchBin <weconsultants@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:45:56 -0400
IchBin wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

(Its output resembles that of netstat, probably intentionally. I don't know whether any UN*Xes have tools such as that, i.e. either a command-line or graphical netstat-plus-process-name - probably some do.)
A Linux netstat man page at

	http://linux.die.net/man/8/netstat

indicates that there's a "--process" flag that shows the process ID and process name (probably the first N characters of the last component of the executable name, or something such as that) of the process that owns the socket; you have to be super-user to get that for processes not your own.

lsof might also be able to get some information of that sort on some UN*Xes.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Thanks Guy for the info. On windows the format is "Netstat -b". I do not see any associated program that started the connection. I suspect that programs that monitor the IP processes like WhatsRunning and System internals, under windows, are just issuing Netstat commands and then capturing the output and display their own display window. At least that is what I have done in the pass when writing that type of interface using Java.


[SNIP]

Again, thanks to you all of your guidance in this thread. This could be a mute issue since I am building a new computer and plan to use a different and newer windows OS. That is, WinXP SP Pro 64bit which may open another can of worms so to speaks


Well after looking around and looking at SmitfraudFix output I see something that is not correct.

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» DNS

Description: Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC #2
DNS Server Search Order: 68.87.64.146
DNS Server Search Order: 68.87.75.194

Description: Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC #2
DNS Server Search Order: 68.87.64.146
DNS Server Search Order: 68.87.75.194

HKLM\SYSTEM\CCS\Services\Tcpip\..\{83A9FF0F-296C-4D45-A153-6B8A6AFF8BCE}: DhcpNameServer=207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 ,207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 HKLM\SYSTEM\CCS\Services\Tcpip\..\{8A153A46-7E4A-44EE-8443-D1D0EA855ABD}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CCS\Services\Tcpip\..\{E55D5B3A-6EDC-4FC0-9E4B-6EEA562E9F44}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS1\Services\Tcpip\..\{83A9FF0F-296C-4D45-A153-6B8A6AFF8BCE}: DhcpNameServer=207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 ,207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS1\Services\Tcpip\..\{8A153A46-7E4A-44EE-8443-D1D0EA855ABD}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS1\Services\Tcpip\..\{E55D5B3A-6EDC-4FC0-9E4B-6EEA562E9F44}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS3\Services\Tcpip\..\{83A9FF0F-296C-4D45-A153-6B8A6AFF8BCE}: DhcpNameServer=207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 ,207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS3\Services\Tcpip\..\{8A153A46-7E4A-44EE-8443-D1D0EA855ABD}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS3\Services\Tcpip\..\{E55D5B3A-6EDC-4FC0-9E4B-6EEA562E9F44}: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CCS\Services\Tcpip\Parameters: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS1\Services\Tcpip\Parameters: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194 HKLM\SYSTEM\CS3\Services\Tcpip\Parameters: DhcpNameServer=68.87.64.146 68.87.75.194

Not sure why these IP address are defined as a DhcpNameServer in the windows registry (Not Comcast): 207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222 ,207.68.160.190 194.25.2.129 208.67.222.222

Not sure how to get rid of them either. Instructions I see about these setting is to avoid changing them. Which does not make sense since I do not think they should be there in the first place. Not realy sure if this is apart of any problems I am having but does not look right. Guess I need to know the implications of having them defined to DhcpNameServer.
--
Thanks in Advance...                           http://weconsulting.org
IchBin, Philadelphia, Pa, USA http://ichbinquotations.weconsulting.org
______________________________________________________________________
'If there is one, Knowledge is the "Fountain of Youth"'
-William E. Taylor, Regular Guy (1952-)