Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thinking of some changes to packet-scsi.c ...
From: Richard Sharpe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:22:44 -0800
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Chris Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Sharpe <[email protected]> writes:
>> If there are any suggestions for other changes, let me know.
> Hi Richard.  It looks like there are other bit-oriented fields besides
> hf_scsi_control that could benefit from this as well: hf_scsi_inquiry_flags,
> hf_scsi_modesel_flags, ...

It is interesting that you mention hf_scsi_inquiry_flags. In my copy
of SCP4-r16 the CMDT bit is obsolete ... I will have to check with
SPC3 though.

> There also seem to be a lot of proto_tree_add_text() calls (I count 186 of
> them).  I haven't looked at them all, but I suspect most would be better added
> using proto_tree_add_item() so those fields could be filterable as well.
> I saw that you posted a patch on Thursday.  Could you open up a bug report and
> submit the patch(es) there instead?  I think it will make it easier to track and
> the patches won't get lost.  Thanks.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Richard Sharpe