Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thinking of some changes to packet-scsi.c ...
From: Richard Sharpe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:45:43 -0800
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Chris Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Sharpe <[email protected]> writes:
>> If there are any suggestions for other changes, let me know.
> Hi Richard.  It looks like there are other bit-oriented fields besides
> hf_scsi_control that could benefit from this as well: hf_scsi_inquiry_flags,
> hf_scsi_modesel_flags, ...
> There also seem to be a lot of proto_tree_add_text() calls (I count 186 of
> them).  I haven't looked at them all, but I suspect most would be better added
> using proto_tree_add_item() so those fields could be filterable as well.
> I saw that you posted a patch on Thursday.  Could you open up a bug report and
> submit the patch(es) there instead?  I think it will make it easier to track and
> the patches won't get lost.  Thanks.

I created bug https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5466
for this since it has nothing to do with iSCSI...

The patch I first posted needs reworking so I will not attach it yet.

I will attach patches as I get make changes.

Richard Sharpe