On Monday 5. October 2009 20.46.03 Jeff Morriss wrote:
> It's been a while, but my memory says that while memory-mapped files are
> great, growing memory mapped files was (significantly) less pleasant.
> Since Wireshark's allocations tend to be incremental, how would you
> plan to deal with that?
As I just mentioned in the reply to Guy Harris, we plan on doing this step-
wise. Maybe allocate 100 MiB at a time. Maybe 200? :-)
It is also quite possible that Guy Harris' reply to this email is the way to
go, i.e., growing a file and mmap'ing the new area.
"Everything will be ok in the end. If its not ok, its not the end."
45C3 E2E7 86CA ADB7 8DAD 51E7 3A1A F085 AD3B CF19
signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.