Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Enhancements to dissecting proxy CONNECT sessions

From: Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:54:45 -0700
Committed as SVN revision 21618.  Thanks for the improvements to that 
feature!  Sorry for the delay in checking it in.

On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could someone review the patch I sent in about two weeks ago, it
> looks like it has been overlooked.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Sake
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:49:16PM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > 
> > Sake
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported
> > > on the users-list:
> > > 
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00047.html
> > > 
> > > Although the problem seems to be a non-functional re-assembly of
> > > the SSL packets when they are proxied. I will take some time to
> > > get familiar with the re-assembly code in wireshark...
> > > 
> > > While looking into the http-dissector I improved a few things on
> > > how it dissects a proxy CONNECT session. This is what I have changed:
> > > 
> > > - added the fields hf_http_proxy_connect_host and -port
> > > 
> > > - changed proto_tree_add_text to proto_tree_add_string and -uint
> > >   so that it's possible to filter on them
> > > 
> > > - make these two fields "PROTO_ITEM_SET_GENERATED"
> > > 
> > > - removed the alteration of the ports within pinfo, now the
> > >   ports in the column info are not changed to the port used to 
> > >   connect to the backend server. It is now possible to use 
> > >   follow-tcp-stream again on proxied ssl sessions.
> > > 
> > > The patch has been tested on FC4.
> > > 
> > > Could someone review this patch?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sake
> > 
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev