Hi,
Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
Cheers,
Sake
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported
> on the users-list:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00047.html
>
> Although the problem seems to be a non-functional re-assembly of
> the SSL packets when they are proxied. I will take some time to
> get familiar with the re-assembly code in wireshark...
>
> While looking into the http-dissector I improved a few things on
> how it dissects a proxy CONNECT session. This is what I have changed:
>
> - added the fields hf_http_proxy_connect_host and -port
>
> - changed proto_tree_add_text to proto_tree_add_string and -uint
> so that it's possible to filter on them
>
> - make these two fields "PROTO_ITEM_SET_GENERATED"
>
> - removed the alteration of the ports within pinfo, now the
> ports in the column info are not changed to the port used to
> connect to the backend server. It is now possible to use
> follow-tcp-stream again on proxied ssl sessions.
>
> The patch has been tested on FC4.
>
> Could someone review this patch?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Sake
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
