Gerald Combs wrote:
> Newer versions of Visual C++ provide better overrun protection. Visual
> C++ 6.0 is also past the end of its supported life cycle:
> http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3003
>
> Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
>> Hello Gerald,
>>
>> is there a reason to switch?
>> If you mean just the installer then I think it's ok.
>>
>> But developing is much better with VC6, because it's much faster and
>> more stable.
>> As long as you don't need .Net there is nor real reason to switch in my
>> opinion.
>> The .Net Studio is just annoying.
>>
>> Also for installers there are better solutions than MSI Installer:
>> NSIS: http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
>> Bitrock installer:
>> http://bitrock.com/products_installbuilder_overview.html (Platform
>> independent installer)
>>
The compiler produces better code, especially with a profiled release
(not available with EE) and is also more standards compliant.
>From a personal (and paying day job) point of view, with our own
unmanaged win32 app (no .Net) migration has been well worthwhile.
--
Regards,
Graham Bloice
