Newer versions of Visual C++ provide better overrun protection. Visual
C++ 6.0 is also past the end of its supported life cycle:
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3003
Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
> Hello Gerald,
>
> is there a reason to switch?
> If you mean just the installer then I think it's ok.
>
> But developing is much better with VC6, because it's much faster and
> more stable.
> As long as you don't need .Net there is nor real reason to switch in my
> opinion.
> The .Net Studio is just annoying.
>
> Also for installers there are better solutions than MSI Installer:
> NSIS: http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
> Bitrock installer:
> http://bitrock.com/products_installbuilder_overview.html (Platform
> independent installer)
>
>
> Gerald Combs schrieb:
>> The official Windows installers are still built using Visual Studio 6.0.
>> I'd like to switch over to Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition before the
>> next release. Is there any reason not to do this?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-dev mailing list
>> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
