Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Comparision of Ethereal with Airopeek and Network Observer

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Jahagirdar VS" <l39igrb02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:49:54 +0530
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:06:07AM -0800, Guy Harris gharris-at-sonic.net |ethereal| wrote:
> Jahagirdar VS wrote:
> >I am trying to compare Ethereal with Observer and  Airopeek.
> >                                                                                                                 
> >My primary concern is Sniffing and analysing WLAN traffic.                 
> >                                                                                                                 
> >Googling did not revel any direct comparision between these tools.         
> >Requesting information on your experience with these tools.
> 
> If you're capturing on Windows, then, unless you're *only* interested in 
> 802.11 data packets, and don't care at all about 802.11 management and 
> control packets, Airopeek and possibly Observer will probably work 
> better, as they have their own drivers that allow running the network 
> adapter in monitor mode and that supply non-data (management and 
> possibly control) packets, with 802.11 headers.
> 
> If you're capturing on Linux or {Free,Net}BSD (and possibly other BSDs), 
> then Ethereal is better, as Observer and Airopeek don't run on any OS 
> other than Windows.
> 
I need to capture all 802.11 packets (data-control-management, Even those with
errors or not adhering to protocol) that can be seen by a WLAN Device, I am
open to changing my OS to get the best out of the tool. Till recently I was
using an outdated version of Observer (with support for 802.11b cards only) for
my work. Now I am looking at alternatives before I decide on upgrading my
license. 
Recently I managed to install Linux on a Laptop with the necessary madwifi
drivers and have started evaulating Ethereal for Packet capture and analysis.
At first cut Ethereal looks as good as (or even better in some respects) than
Observer for the kind of work I do(debug and testing of WLAN devices). So I am
trying to find out Ethereal strengths and weaknesses compared to its commercial
couterparts.

regards
Jahagirdar V S

> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users

-- 
"I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body.  Then I realized who was telling me this." - Emo Phillips
Jahagirdar .V.S
IC Design Engineer , Texas Instruments (India) Ltd.
91-80-25099129(O) 91-80-28540394(R)