Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] SCCP segmentation

[LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think it should not be hard to do it based of the binding_info.

Beware that if (binding == &no_binding) we do not have a binding so
you should not reassemble or else we'll have trouble.

BTW: binding is not the propper name, session or call might be better names.

Luis

On 1/18/06, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking into it.
> Brg
> Anders
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
> > supported in Ethereal.
> > Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?
> >
> > I have a trace I can send on demand.
> >
> > Olivier.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>


--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan