I'd been meaning to take a look at the binding_info stuff. Is it
basically equivalent to a conversation for SCCP? (I had always
envisioned using/adapting the conversation stuff to SCCP to keep track
of Class-2 stuff but have never had time.)
LEGO wrote:
I think it should not be hard to do it based of the binding_info.
Beware that if (binding == &no_binding) we do not have a binding so
you should not reassemble or else we'll have trouble.
BTW: binding is not the propper name, session or call might be better names.
Luis
On 1/18/06, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into it.
Brg
Anders
Hi Olivier,
you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.
Best regards
Michael
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra) wrote:
Hello,
It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
supported in Ethereal.
Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?
I have a trace I can send on demand.
Olivier.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
