> - He is willing to assist us in the case. However, he can't do pro
> bono work in California (CA), which is where it makes the
> most sense to file a case.
Hmmm, the product is distributed globally and the site lists these
distributors. Shouldn't I be making the distributor in say, the Netherlands
(or the EU), aware that he is distributing a product that violates
copyright?
And while we're at it, shouldn't we be making the (list of) customers of
this product aware as well?
> Questions for copyright holders.
>
> In order to proceed with this, Ethereal's copyright holders need to
> agree on a final objective. Do we simply want ClearSight to stop
> infringement? Do we want them to open the source of Analyzer? Do we
> want damages? Should they be allowed to keep doing what they're
> doing, provided they pay a licensing fee?
I concur with Joerg Mayer's reply on this.
> I'll try to set up a communication channel for Ethereal's copyright
> holders in the meantime. This will probably be in the form of another
> mailing list.
http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/fla/fla.en.html
that's what this is for, right?
Regards,
Tom Uijldert Email: Tom.Uijldert [at] logicacmg.com
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
