Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
From: Chad Webb <Chad.Webb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:45:20 -0500
Bill, That's exactly what I've done. Without the system being a monitor, capturing packets while browsing the Internet displays packets as I expect. -Chad Bill Baltas said the following on 10/10/2007 1:30 PM: > Chad, > > Your capture ports look okay. Could you have a capture filter defined in Wireshark? > Also, are you sure the capture workstation is not working properly. > > One easy way to check the workstation is to turn off the capture to the > destination port (no monitor session 1 destination interface Gi0/22). Give > > this PC an IP address, turn on wireshark and browse the Internet. You should > see all of the TCP traffic to and from this machine. If you get the same > results as before, its a problem with your machine or your wireshark configuration. > > Good Luck > Bill Baltas >>I'm currently using version 0.99.6 on a Windows platform. >> >>I have the following configuration set up on my Cisco 3560 switch. >> >>monitor session 1 source interface Gi0/21 (Windows XP Desktop) >>monitor session 1 destination interface Gi0/22 (Windows XP Laptop >>w/Wireshark application) >> >>I start a capture, selecting the interface connected to the switch. >> The >>capture returns traffic, but all that I'm seeing is what appears to be >>mostly ARP, Broadcast, DNS Queries and some UDP traffic (all expected). >> What I'm not seeing is the TCP STREAMS.....I can see some TCP traffic >>but not the entire stream....so I can't follow any of them. For >>example, I've been trying to uncover an issue with IMAP mail clients >>having "network disconnects" to a remote server. When I do anything in >>my mail all I see is Echo traffic and Source = "localhost" and >>destination is shown as the system on which my mail client resides. >> >>Why can't I see the traffic across the switch like I'm expecting to? >> Do >>I have something misconfigured. I > haven't done this too often but I >>though I had once before and saw all of the traffic as normal. >> >>Please help. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Chad Webb > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user > panel > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48516/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 >> and lay it on us. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users -- Chad S. Webb Systems Administrator General Dynamics Information Technology NOAA\NESDIS\NCDDC Bldg 1100 Rm 117 Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 Voice: 228.688.3808 Email: Chad.Webb@xxxxxxxx; chad.webb@xxxxxxxx www.gdit.com
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
- From: Bill Baltas
- [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Fwd: Wireshark to K12 comparison]
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] Understanding what I'm seeing
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] windows standard SSL/TLS library not recognized by wireshark
- Index(es):

