Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:09:57 +1000

Since autonegotiate is unreliable :

If you use autonegotiate  there is a probability (small today) thet the peers will negotiate a duplex mismatch after each link up event.
This probability is small today but nonzero  and depends on timings inside the chipsets, cable length, noice, bad luck etc
Certain chipsets even today just can not negotiate properly and will even today get a near 1.0 probability of negotiating a mismatch.


If you always have everything forced to full duplex   there will never be any mismatches.


Forcing everything to full duplex takes a small amount of extra work to do  but makes the probability of a duplex mismatch zero.


On 9/7/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:56:09AM +1000, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> "Autoneg does fail sometimes."
>
> True.
> Autonegotiate is broken by design and one should never ever use
> autonegotiate.

That's a very broad statement. Let's just say I disagree: Acutally I
know of some medium to large installations, where autoneg is the default
by now. Btw, about 6 years ago I would have stated that autoneg causes
more problems than it solves - by now I think the other way round.

Ciao
      Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
      • From: Joerg Mayer
  • References:
    • [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
      • From: Alan Middlehurst
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
      • From: Jaap Keuter
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
      • From: ronnie sahlberg
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
      • From: Joerg Mayer
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] No TCP traffic
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation