Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How can Wireshark improve

[Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/25/14 10:02 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> 
> Yes.  I think in most cases you want to split packet relations up into
> two buckets :
> "packets are related because they form a request/reply (and or cancel) pair"
> and
> "packets are related for some other reason".
> 
> We could fix this by changing all request/response fields to a new
> FT_REQUEST_REPONSE type.

This would let the Qt related packet delegate draw its indicators a bit
more intelligently.