Just trying to understand what is going on here:
Isn't UNICODE a bit to broad a name here? Wouldn't STR_UTF8 be a better
name as there are different unicode encodings around?
Thanks
Jörg
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:48:36PM +0000, darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53827
>
> User: darkjames
> Date: 2013/12/07 03:48 PM
>
> Log:
> Drop proto_tree_add_unicode_string() from IP, IPv6, JSON dissectors.
>
> Set .display to STR_UNICODE (instead of STR_ASCII).
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +18 -18 packet-ip.c Modified
> +18 -18 packet-ipv6.c Modified
> +2 -2 packet-json.c Modified
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/
> Changes Path Action
> +4 -0 proto.c Modified
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
> mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
