On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And for now I just documented the capture
> buffer size as "MiB" since that's the correct units. I have no problem
> changing the implementation of the capture buffer size to SI units though,
> if anyone thinks it makes more sense to do that.
Most if not all OSes will probably either require or prefer that the capture buffer size be a power of 2, and there's no good reason for it to be a multiple of a power of 10.
