Does this mean that all proto_tree_add_* calls would need to have
&hf_name instead of just hf_name?
I'm not attached to them in principle (and getting rid of them seems
like it would be a performance/memory win) but your description is
awfully vague...
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
<darkjames-ws@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone attached to hf_ variables? ;)
>
> There's no real need of them, and we can just replace them with
> header_field_info structure.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
