On May 12, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Guy Harris skrev 2013-05-11 19:45:
>> On May 11, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to move the reassembled data from the reassembled_table to frame_data.
>
> If the pointer to the reassembled data is stored in the per_packet_data in frame_data the memory usage should work out to be the same or a bit less as the reassembled hash table wouldn't be needed, right?
If it's stored as per-packet data, then it involves no change to the frame_data structure, so it doesn't involve increasing the size of that structure (which would involve adding 4 to 8 bytes for every packet).
