Hi,
This would normally have to go through Bugzilla, so to better track and comment
on patches. This patch for instance lacks line numbers.
--- epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (revision 36487)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c (working copy)
@@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
static int hf_cflow_ipv6_exthdr = -1;
So I'm wondering what diff tool you are using?
Thanks,
Jaap
On 04/06/2011 06:55 AM, Motonori Shindo wrote:
Hi,
Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
different semantics so they should be distinguishable when they are
displayed or specified in a filter. Please find attached the patch
which does that.
Regards,
---
Motonori Shindo
