Is this right (from epan/proto.c):
proto_item*
proto_tree_get_parent(proto_tree *tree) {
if (!tree)
return (NULL);
return (proto_item*) tree;
}
This basically returns the same thing that is received as a parameter.
Shouldn't tree->parent be returned instead, just as
proto_item_get_parent() (a few lines above in the same file) does?
The weird thing is that there is code using this seemingly broken
proto_tree_get_parent(). I don't know how things are working given that
proto_tree_get_parent() is not really providing the parent node.
Confused,
Eloy Paris.-
netexpect.org
