On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:29:42PM +0000, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> I'm not quite up-to-speed with the problems here: is the problem that we
> have some GPLv2-only parts and some GPLv3-only parts? I'm not sure that
> that is a new problem, is it?
Wireshark binaries should be under a "GPLv2 or newer" license, not a
"GPLv2" license.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
