Riverbed Cascade Pilot Personal Edition: Take Wireshark to the Next Level - Advanced Triggers and Alerts; Web and VoIP Analytics; Long-Term Trending and Forensics; Deep Packet Analysis with Wireshark

Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] Should we have proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val_32() ?

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists

Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 07:40:26 +0100

Hi,
proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val() returns guint64 which might cause unnecessary
problems handling smaller values which probably is the most common.
When printing them for example.

Regards
Anders

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Help of correlation
Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Versions of NBAP, RRC, RANAP and RNSAP supported in 1.0.4 release of wireshark
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help of correlation
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Versions of NBAP, RRC, RANAP and RNSAP supported in 1.0.4 release of wireshark
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread