Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] Should we have proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val_32() ?

ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] Should we have proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val_32() ?

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 07:40:26 +0100

Hi,
proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val() returns guint64 which might cause unnecessary
problems handling smaller values which probably is the most common.
When printing them for example.

Regards
Anders

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Help of correlation
Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Versions of NBAP, RRC, RANAP and RNSAP supported in 1.0.4 release of wireshark
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help of correlation
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Versions of NBAP, RRC, RANAP and RNSAP supported in 1.0.4 release of wireshark
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube