Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-ncp22222.inc

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:12:40 -0400

It looks suspicious to me but I know nothing about NCP, so perhaps it's
best to file a bug report and then when someone with knowledge of NCP
has a chance to look at it, he can either fix it or close the bug as
invalid if the behavior is correct as is (although if it is ok as is, at
the very least, it might help to include a comment of "intentional
fall-through" to avoid confusion).

- Chris
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pavol Rusnak
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:02 AM
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-
> ncp22222.inc
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> I was going through the ncp dissector code and found this (whitespace
> does not match):
> 
> 8541      pvalues[2].vflags = request_value->req_nds_flags;
> 8542      pvalues[2].nds_version = request_value->nds_version;
> 8543      pvalues[2].pflags = request_value->req_nds_prot_flags;
> 8544  case 0x04:
> 8545     pvalues[0].vvalue = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, nds_offset);
> 8546     if (pvalues[0].vvalue == 0)
> 
> I'd like to ask whether is the missing "break;" intentional or is this
a
> bug. Thanks!
> 
> --
> Best Regards / S pozdravom,
> 
> Pavol RUSNAK                                       SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
> Package Maintainer                                Lihovarska 1060/12
> PGP 0xA6917144                                     19000 Praha 9, CR
> prusnak[at]suse.cz                                http://www.suse.cz
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-ncp22222.inc
      • From: Bill Meier
  • References:
    • [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-ncp22222.inc
      • From: Pavol Rusnak
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] heuristic Dissector for Dummies
  • Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking and endpoint contexts between layers
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-ncp22222.inc
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Question about missing break; in packet-ncp22222.inc
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation