Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?

From: "Bryant Eastham" <beastham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:50:03 -0700

Didier wrote:
>Not an expert either but if you use the same table for
>both directions you may
>have duplicate if TCP relative sequence number is set.
>cf bug: 
>http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1392

Thanks. I didn't go into that level of detail but I do maintain a
different table for each direction, based on the address in the
conversation.

-Bryant

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
  - From: Neil Piercy
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
  - From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
  - From: Richard van der Hoff
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
  - From: Bryant Eastham
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
  - From: Didier

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Capturing to something else than files or humans
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Capturing to something else than files or humans
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is there a good way of handling "per pdu" info ?
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Donating to support development?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread