Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:18:17 +0200

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:56:59PM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
> 1. When connected to an open network all packages have 4 trailing  
> bytes which is not recognized correctly as a "tagged parameter", and  
> the packet is tagged malformed.  Is this some sort of ICV for  
> unprotected packages?  See the attached capture ieee80211-clear.pcap.

Got to the preferences, protocols, ieee80211 and select that the frame
is to be treated to include the FCS. That might help.

> 2. When connected to a wep encrypted network the data package is  
> marked as protected but the data part is not encrypted and the  
> content is not dissected.  Is this be because the mac os driver has  
> decrypted the data before they are captured with wireshark?  In this  
> case I think the data should be dissected.  See the attached capture  
> ieee80211-wep.pcap, with a IPP package which is not dissected.

IIRC, that is configureable as well. Ignore the protection bit.

> 3. A question for the wlancap dissector: The SSI-type seems to have  
> wrong endian, and the SSI-signal has a negative value.  Should this  
> be handled by the dissector?
> 
> I do not know anything about the 802.11 protocol (yet), but I am  
> willing to make a fix if I understand how to handle this :)

Need to check.

 ciao
     Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector
      • From: Stig Bjørlykke
  • References:
    • [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector
      • From: Stig Bjørlykke
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Update official Windows build?
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Questions about IEEE 802.11 dissector
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation