Comment # 8
on bug 8368
from Alexis La Goutte
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > About
> > + {0x00, "8,191 Octets"},
> > + {0x01, "16,383 Octets"},
> > + {0x02, "32,767 Octets"},
> > + {0x03, "65,535 Octets"},
> > + {0x04, "131,071 Octets"},
> > + {0x05, "262,143 Octets"},
> > + {0x06, "524,287 Octets"},
> > {0x07, "1,048,575"},
> >
> > Why do not remove the comma ? (Also missing Octets for 0x07 ?)
>
> I thought the commas made the numbers far easier to read, on the other hand
> you are the second one who didn't like them so maybe I should just remove
> them!
>
For some people... (French... the comma is your dot for number... ;-))
> I've fixed the "Octets" missing on the last line.
>
> > It will better to add the unit in description of hf ? (
> > hf_ieee80211_vht_max_ampdu )
>
> Maybe, though I doubt most people will ever see the description - Where does
> it appear? I have never noticed it in the GUI!?
In left bottom of GUI, but i will be set in description field of hf value
>
> If we do remove the Octets, we should do the same for the other fields with
> "Octets" in.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
