Comment # 13
on bug 2992
from Chris Maynard
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
>
> You may need to provide more context. Yes in line 1736
> transport_info->media_count is set to -1, however it can't get to line 1906
> with a negative value because it will fail at the for loop in line 1827,
> which requires n to be positive.
Well, there's a lot of context that Coverity provides, but in a nutshell, the
scope of the for loop beginning at line 1827 ends at line 1903, so I do believe
it's possible to reach 1906 with transport_info->media_count set to -1.
Although Coverity (like just about every other tool) does generate some false
positives, I don't believe that's the case here. But it's certainly possible
that both Coverity and I could be wrong.
BTW, if you're interested, I believe Gerald could get you a Wireshark Coverity
login. Initially, anybody could request a login directly from Coverity, but I
*think* that's changed now.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
- You are watching all bug changes.
