Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
SHARKFEST '13 - Wireshark Developer and User Conference - June 16-19, 2013 - UC Berkeley
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7256] Fix loop counting

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:51:13 -0700 (PDT)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7256

--- Comment #5 from Frank Lahm <franklahm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-16 10:51:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> As stated by Jakub, this change can trigger memory errors with fuzzed packets
> (see bug 7261 for example).
> I checked in revision 42636 some sanity checks to avoid putting thousands of
> "null" entries in the tree. I decided (randomly) to put a limit of 20 entries.
> Please confirm if this value makes sense.

That's perfectly fine. Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.

  • References:
    • [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7256] New: Fix loop counting
      • From: bugzilla-daemon
  • Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7263] cflow.timeend >= cflow.sysuptime - Option to compare the fields
  • Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6986] Updating the RPL SRH dissector and implementing RPL Options header dissection
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7256] Fix loop counting
  • Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6986] Updating the RPL SRH dissector and implementing RPL Options header dissection
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation