https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
--- Comment #16 from Martin Kaiser <wireshark@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-08 01:24:20 PST ---
Hi Bill,
(In reply to comment #13)
> Note: I took the liberty of making a few minor changes before i commited the
> new dissector.
>
> If there are any concerns as to the changes I made please let me know (or feel
> free to submit a patch).
thanks a lot for merging the dissector, that's really good news :)
The changes you made look ok, I haven't checked them in detail yet. In fact, I
was unsure about how much error checking I have to do and I was wondering if
the column code was a bit too clumsy.
> Question: It seems to me that it might be useful to be able to filter on the
> "event" field in the header. What do you think ?
You're right. When I saw this (just before submitting the patch), I couldn't
think of a quick way to introduce an hf_... variable without changing the way
the pseudo-header is displayed. I'll look at this again and submit a patch to
fix this (this will take some time, I'll be busy the next weeks).
Best regards,
Martin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
