https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1918
--- Comment #2 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-09 08:17:50 CET ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You missed a few. Here are all those with the msb set:
> #define T30_FC_DTC 0x81
> #define T30_FC_CIG 0x82
> #define T30_FC_NSC 0x84
> #define T30_FC_PWD 0x83
> #define T30_FC_SEP 0x85
> #define T30_FC_PSA 0x86
> #define T30_FC_CIA 0x87
> #define T30_FC_ISP 0x88
Yes, the code evolves, so does the bug.
> Only the last 2 are not a case target of the switch ... but maybe they should
> be? (The msb of "the 'octet'" is also masked in other places before the
> switch.)
Could be.
> Maybe someone who knows this protocol could have a look at it and compare it
> against the spec?: http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-T.30-200509-I/en
Yep.
> By the way Jaap, the URL you listed is now broken. I guess URL's sometimes
> change in 3 years. :)
Really? ;)
It was a nice overview showing the protocol.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
