Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1847] TCP Duplicate ACK's not being marked as such in "Exp
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:04:37 -0800 (PST)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1847 --- Comment #2 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-08 15:04:33 PST --- Wondering if anyone could take a look at this? (packet-tcp.c really confuses me.) Perhaps another sequence of events summarized differently? 3) .59 -> .159 Seq#1449 15) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (+PSH) 16) .59 -> .159 Seq#1449 (TCP Retransmission) 18) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (+PSH) <= This is actually the 1st duplicate ACK. 19) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#1) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#2 21) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#2) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#3 23) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#3) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#4 25) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#4) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#5 27) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#5) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#6 29) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#6) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#7 31) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#7) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#8 33) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#8) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#9 35) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#9) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#10 37) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#10) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#11 39) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#11) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#12 41) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 18#12) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#13 43) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (+PSH) <= This is actually the 14th duplicate ACK. 44) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#1) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#15 46) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#2) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#16 48) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#3) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#17 50) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#4) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#18 52) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#5) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#19 54) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#6) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#20 56) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#7) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#21 58) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#8) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#22 60) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#9) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#23 62) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#10) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#24 64) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#11) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#25 66) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#12) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#26 68) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#13) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#27 70) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#14) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#28 72) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#15) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#29 74) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#16) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#30 76) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#17) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#31 78) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (Dup ACK 43#18) <= Should be Dup ACK 15#32 79) .159 -> .59 ACK#1449 (+PSH) <= This is actually the 33rd duplicate ACK. 81) .59 -> .159 Seq#1449 (TCP Retransmission) <= FINALLY! (For some reason from the time when I reported this bug and now, the seq #'s appear to be off by 1, so where I had referred to 1448 before, the capture file now indicates 1449.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5376] new dissector for the SAMETIME protocol
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 5270] diff for a new dissector for COAP (draft-ietf-core-coap)
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1701] New feature request -- NDIS 802.11 support
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1847] TCP Duplicate ACK's not being marked as such in "Expert Info".
- Index(es):
- Get Wireshark
- Download
- Code of Conduct