https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
--- Comment #3 from Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@xxxxxxx> 2009-12-19 04:35:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> /* The initial sequencial processing stage */
>
> You can't really depend on that, we might go multithreaded (gasp). I think the
> only proper way is using a tap.
Then I guess the drop detection is also broken as the same trick is used there.
I don't know enough about the "tap" API/interface, can you:
1. Give me a link to some developers docs about "tap"?
2. Recommend a source code file I can use/read as a good example?
P.S. I'm currently pulled off on another project, so I cannot reimplement this
stuff right away, and I'm only using Wireshark for prototyping before
implementing this stuff in my kernel module (that means the kernel module have
higher priority, that implementing it perfectly for Wireshark).
If you have time feel free to implement my changes as a tap.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
