Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3166] Support for GSM Um and LAPDm

From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:03:12 -0800 (PST)

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3166





--- Comment #3 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-03 04:03:11 PDT ---
When looking at packet-gsm_um.c I noticed that first you:
+               if( !pinfo->pseudo_header->gsm_um.uplink ) {
then:
+                               uplink = ....;
+                               downlink = ....;
but then:
+                       freq = pinfo->pseudo_header->gsm_um.uplink ? uplink :
downlink;

This results in freq is always downlink, so why bother with uplink? Or is that
intentional?

Due to the test before this line:
+     else if( /*arfcn >= 0 &&*/ arfcn <= 124 ) { /* guint is always >= 0! */
this line collapses into:
+     else if( arfcn == 0 ) {
Overlapping regions are a pain, since now E-GSM 900 is mostly hidden behind
P-GSM 900.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.