https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2828
--- Comment #5 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-25 07:56:33 PDT ---
Hi,
>Thanks for the response. I'm not sure what is needed for a feature request or
>how large the diameter group is. Perhaps you can point me to a pre-existing
>write-up on the feature request procedures?
Well this is it (wireshark bugs). I just wanted to point out that this is
not a bug in the implementation.
>My comment about the full RFC 4005 compliance was based upon your previous
>update that directed me towards the nasreq.xml file. I was surprised with how
>small it was so I went back to the RFC and found a few codes that weren't
>implemented in the file (see a short list below).
I would have to look it up but a quick look at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/aaa-parameters/aaa-parameters.xhtml
seems to imply that some of the command codes are first defined in the Base
RFC. This is the problem each "application" reuses stuff from other
"applications" and the (wireshark .xml)files are not meant to be used "stand
alone". Do you have problems decoding some AVP missing from the files?
/Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
