> You can already display-filter on bad checksums, both for IP and TCP.
Thanks!
But I think that **any** error detected could be highlighted by default - to
avoid wasting too much time on analyzing the side-effects.
> I don't imagine that capture filtering will ever be up to the job.
I was also considering the display-filter. I know that the capturing filter
is less sophisticated - and have always been "frustrated" about the differences
between those two filters.
Sorry that I by accident forgot to post my previous message to the mailing-list
(was a direct reply to Richard).
Regards,
Mads Bligaard Nielsen
Core Software Development, Ericsson Diax
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Urwin [mailto:RUrwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 14. oktober 2002 10:31
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
Before someone else tells us...
You can already display-filter on bad checksums, both for IP and TCP. I
don't imagine that capture filtering will ever be up to the job.
The packet summary idea is good, though.
--
Richard Urwin, Private
"No 9000 series computer has ever made a mitsake or corrubiteddatatato."
