On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:02:44PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Steven Pfister wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to learn a little about wireless troubleshooting. In
> > reading about the sniffer mode of Cisco APs, a lot of the Cisco
> > pages I've read say it requires Airopeek. But a Cisco Press book I'm
> > reading says "operates with an Omnipeek, Airmagnet, or Wireshark
> > server." Is there such a thing as a Wireshark server?
>
> Perhaps there is, but nobody appears to have bothered to tell the
> Wireshark core team about it. :-)
Acutally, someone did:
$ svn log packet-airopeek.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r26743 | wmeier | 2008-11-10 18:59:13 +0100 (Mo, 10. Nov 2008) | 2 lines
Call tvb_new_subset with correct offset no matter whether tree is TRUE or FALSE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r24395 | jmayer | 2008-02-19 23:08:11 +0100 (Di, 19. Feb 2008) | 1 line
Update todo section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r23852 | jmayer | 2007-12-13 00:26:39 +0100 (Do, 13. Dez 2007) | 3 lines
The extra bytes seem to go away if I call wlan_datapad instead
of wlan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r23851 | jmayer | 2007-12-13 00:03:44 +0100 (Do, 13. Dez 2007) | 4 lines
Beginnings of airopeek remote capture support.
The metainformation is not yet decoded, also, there
are problems with QoS frames (extra bytes).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
